DLVid
Member
Hi all, as we get closer to going back on location I thought I'd do some testing of my TC2E to check its latency to see if it will work for Imag. My testing method is as follows: I have a BMD Ursa Broadcast camera connected to the switcher via SDI. I have a black burst generator connected to the switcher and camera. The camera is set to the same format and frame rate as each session. I have a laptop running a millisecond timer. I am shooting the laptop display with the camera and outputting that signal on my critical monitor. To find latency, I take video of both screens, find a clean frame of both images and do some simple math. The results were surprising. Genlocking the system resulted in significantly higher latency. I then went on to test adjusting the camera lines of timing and the switcher H & V position. The camera lines had an effect but not in the right direction. Switcher H & V had no effect. Below is a table of the results. I'd really like the system to be around 60 - 80ms; thoughts? Your feedback is welcome. Anyone using a TC2E for Imag out there?
SESSION | SOURCE TIME | OUTPUT TIME | CAMERA LINES | LATENCY (ms) | |
720P/59.94 | FREE RUN | 26.011 | 25.889 | 0 | 122 |
GENLOCKED | 36.318 | 36.126 | 0 | 192 | |
1080P/29.97 | FREE RUN | 19.965 | 19.775 | 0 | 190 |
GENLOCKED | 17.089 | 16.831 | 0 | 258 | |
1080P/59.94 | FREE RUN | 42.234 | 42.109 | 0 | 125 |
GENLOCKED | 10.368 | 10.236 | 0 | 132 | |
CAMERA LINES | LATENCY (ms) | ||||
1080P/29.97 | FREE RUN | 19.965 | 19.775 | 0 | 190 |
GENLOCKED | 7.007 | 6.75 | 0 | 257 | |
48.799 | 48.542 | 1 | 257 | ||
58.783 | 58.528 | 2 | 255 | ||
2.269 | 1.95 | 3 | 319 | ||
14.591 | 14.332 | 4 | 259 | ||
38.622 | 38.366 | 5 | 256 | ||
57.723 | 57.469 | -1 | 254 | ||
19.004 | 18.688 | -2 | 316 | ||
4.895 | 4.574 | -3 | 321 | ||
49.695 | 49.374 | -4 | 321 | ||
23.392 | 23.199 | -5 | 193 | ||
28.799 | 28.543 | 10 | 256 | ||
2.141 | 1.887 | -10 | 254 | ||
SWITCHER H POS | |||||
13.182 | 12.926 | 20% | 256 | ||
16.796 | 16.54 | 50% | 256 | ||
15.355 | 15.1 | 80% | 255 | ||
4.446 | 4.19 | -20% | 256 | ||
5.951 | 5.694 | -50% | 257 | ||
56.574 | 56.318 | -80% | 256 | ||
SWITCHER V POS | |||||
17.149 | 16.894 | 20% | 255 | ||
5.599 | 5.341 | 50% | 258 | ||
53.726 | 53.47 | 80% | 256 | ||
54.559 | 54.302 | -20% | 257 | ||
45.791 | 45.535 | -50% | 256 | ||
55.292 | 55.053 | -80% | 239 |