Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: XBox 360 Middleware

  1. #1
    Beyond Reality WizCraker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Clovis New Mexico
    Posts
    1,410

    XBox 360 Middleware

    I wish NewTek would take game development serious, if they only would support those who want to use Lightwave to develop the artistic elements for a Game. At the Developer Xbox Middleware providers page I see Maya, Softimage and 3D Studio Max. Wish we could see Lightwave on that list.

    Of course this is just a random thought.
    ImageReality.com

    "Relax...it's just an update for the patch to fix the nerf that nerfed the fix for the update of the patch that broke the fix that was fixed."

    Late 2013 MacPro 12 Core

  2. #2

    They really should

    Gaming is bigger than movies now, Newtek really has to see this. There's nothing wrong with LW, its the lack of plugins and developer interest. I dunno if that's anything Newtek can do anything about, but surely including a Lightwave PLE with games such as DOOM 3 would have been the obvious solution. Let the community make the plugins... but the community has to know that Lightwave even EXISTS.

    It really saddens me when I go to try to learn about how to mod DOOM 3, and the message boards are simply CHOCK FULL of people who don't even know what Lightwave or a .lwo ARE.
    please power off before disconnecting connecting connectors

  3. #3
    I am Jack's cold sweat Karmacop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Bathurst, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    2,117
    The lack of a downloadable demo version is really letting Lightwave down.

  4. #4
    A dog's life... Riplakish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by Karmacop
    The lack of a downloadable demo version is really letting Lightwave down.
    I've asked this before, and never got a real response... Given that a normal media kit does "Discovery Mode" without a key, could one not distribute the standard media as a demo?

    I realize there would be licensing issues at present, but it wouldn't take much for Lightwave to say "[We hereby authorize you to...] Please, give a copy of CD 1 to your friends and coworkers".

    -B

  5. #5
    Not BANNED!, and quit claiming you are. - The Mods somnambulance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    610
    Unless there is some update with normal maps I dont know about, the situation isnt very good there either. I didnt notice any mention of it in version 9...?

  6. #6
    Game Developer
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    167
    Quote Originally Posted by somnambulance
    Unless there is some update with normal maps I dont know about, the situation isnt very good there either. I didnt notice any mention of it in version 9...?

    I mentioned this before, but they really need to support COLLADA export format as well.

  7. #7
    I am Jack's cold sweat Karmacop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Bathurst, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    2,117
    As far as I knew COLLADA didn't even support COLLADA very well. Do you use it a lot? And what for?

  8. #8
    I AM THE Action_Bob
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    398

    Normally I would defend lightwave, butt.....

    I have to agree with the general concensus here. I teach in the Game Art Design program at a well-known tech school/college. The application of choice is 3dsmax. While I am slowly and painfully learning Max to increase my arsenal of digital tools, I often do demonstration (in my introductory photoshop class) model texturing. For this purpose, I use lightwave to display the models with their textures applied. I always feel a little down when many my students have never heard of lightwave. They have heard of Max, Maya and to a lesser extent xsi Softimage. I then go into my usual defense of lightwave listing examples from television and film to give them an idea of where it is used.

    The Gaming industry is HUGE. It is a fact that it generates more money than film etc. This is an area where more hype, exposure and i/o support need to be developed for our beloved package. Up until this point, I have avoided teaching the 3d courses offered at my school (and there are a lot of them) as I am stubborn and didn't want to learn Max. Now, I have been asked to teach a world building class (game level design) and I must get to grips with Max to do that. I would much rather use my preferred tool, but my supervisors will not allow it.

    Max is the most common application used in game design and with built in features like Normal mapping (NO outside plugs) and very well supported input/output file format for direct export to game engines, I can't really fight for using Lightwave.

    Even if Newtek decides not to develop our app in this direction, more exposure and hype need to be given to Lightwave. It is an excellent app, but I get tired of defending my app of choice to the many young students (read: soon to be the people driving the 3d industry) who are starting out with digital content creation and don't even realize that Lightwave is a player out there. It is not my job to be a walking advertisement for lightwave.



    -Adrian

  9. #9
    Worms no more! Free fun! Dodgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    8,273
    I work in the industry and to be honest for every games company out there there is a games engine, so asking for one particular engine to be supported kinda seems a bit pointless. You might as well as for the HL2 engine or unreal or any number of them to be supported. When we use and engine, it's usually the engine writers who make the conversion tools, not the 3d package.
    Push the software, don't let it push YOU!
    My own plugins and work:www.mikegreen.name
    LaptopSetup:corei7 2.4GHz nvidia GT 650M 8Gig win8 64
    WorkSetup:core i7 3.4Ghz nvidia Quadro 2000 12Gig Ram Win7

  10. #10
    Heir to the Throne RedBull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Underground
    Posts
    1,608
    What does LW need to do to imrprove the game support?

    As Max and Gmax, and to a lesser extent Maya and XSI, already have this
    market dominated...

    So what could LW do to make it better?
    .lwo is a fairly good format, and .lws and .lwo are both open formats
    unlike some other applications like maya or xsi, or max.

    I see exporter/importers for Grand Theft Auto, etc....
    So people are making the plugins.....
    But i dare say it's one hard market to take people away from Max.
    (You don't need LW's lovely renderer)

    As mentioned, it's impossible and stupid for NT to support every new engine,
    no matter how popular.

    Direct3D and DirectX, CG shaders, would all be benefits that LW doesn't have
    that the others benefit from, but what are the others?

  11. #11
    I AM THE Action_Bob
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Aurora, Colorado
    Posts
    398
    Perhaps I was a little off base with some of my comments, but the comment about exposure still holds. Lightwave needs more exposure and hype to let people know about it. I feel disheartened whenever I mention it and people get that look on their face like a dog hearing a high pitched noise (whah?).



    Perhaps I shouldn't be upset and just be happy that I can do things quicker and easier in lightwave (well some things).

    -adrian

  12. #12
    Beyond Reality WizCraker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Clovis New Mexico
    Posts
    1,410
    When I originally posted this topic I wasn't saying that NewTek should support x game engine, I was more trying to through out the idea of them supporting for instance the middleware providers. Kind of discouraging as a user of Lightwave to go to the developer site such as the new Xbox 360 and not see NewTek even listed on the map as being involved for developers for middleware. I see Avid [Softimage], Alias [Maya and Studio Tools], and Autodesk [Max].

    I guess I'm just wanting to see more Industry support from NewTek on such things. It also helps to get Lightwave noticed by those that otherwise would not even take a second look at Lightwave and go straight for Maya, Max, or XSI.
    ImageReality.com

    "Relax...it's just an update for the patch to fix the nerf that nerfed the fix for the update of the patch that broke the fix that was fixed."

    Late 2013 MacPro 12 Core

  13. #13
    Heir to the Throne RedBull's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Underground
    Posts
    1,608
    NT don't have the advertising of Discreet of Avid, or Alias....

    I'm not sure about the middleware stuff for the 360... I read the page..
    Seems more like a con for Microsoft to charge money for companies
    to be mentioned in marketing for Xbox than anything else..

    I agree LW should be promoted and used more in this field...
    But exactly how to best achieve this, i dunno...
    You can't stop snobbery, but we sure can try...

  14. #14
    Member sammael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    1,653
    Lightwave could be good for games if a few essential features were implimented.

    -Smoothing Groups
    -Geometry Instancing
    -Normal Mapping in viewport/renderer
    -Propper display of textures with alpha in the viewport (without having a seperate alpha map or clip map)
    -SMOOTHING GROUPS!!

    Just to name a few that I have had problems with trying to export to game engines and shockwave.

  15. #15
    Huge Member mkiii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    West Sussex UK
    Posts
    1,102
    I work in the games industry. I use LW to model 99.99% of everything I do at work & home. NO one else at work uses LW, supports LW, or has any intention of supporting LW. Apart from a couple of copies of XSI & Maya, needed for specific projects. Max is the App of choice.

    The big big issue for Next Gen game development on PC & Consoles such as the 360, is (for us at least), being able to create hi poly objects, normal maps, and to be able to use shaders such as CG, & DirectX directly, as the other main apps.

    LW doesn't even support DirectX other than a plugin to export .X files (do any game developers even use .x files?). As for programmable shaders, well I haven't seen any evidence.

    On top of that, there is the need for experienced artists, coders & animators. Well they just ain't out there I'm afraid. Apart from the odd coves who like to torture themselves writing scripts & plugins for LW (you hearing me Dave?), they seem to be a rare breed.

    I'm quite happy to continue using LW unsupported at work, and at home for freelance modelling work, where the customer only needs a UV mapped mesh, but I don't envisage my company ever using LW to create game content, cos these days, it really isn't enough just to be able to make a nice model.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •