Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Intel announces 28 core; AMD announces 32 core

  1. #1

    Intel announces 28 core; AMD announces 32 core

    Intel unveiled a new High End Desktop CPU that can apparently run stable at 5GHz on all 56 threads.
    https://www.techpowerup.com/244853/i...hedt-processor

    AMD announced a 2nd generation Threadripper with 32 cores/64 threads
    https://www.techpowerup.com/244901/a...-with-32-cores

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    541
    Does this have any implications in terms of a desirability for CPU rendering over GPU like Octane. Not sure how the costs compare, but say 5 or 10 of either of these in a little renderfarm could speed up things significantly ?

  3. #3
    Super Member samurai_x's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    lalaland
    Posts
    1,231
    About time Intel tries to catch up with gpu. Their monopoly has made desktop cpu stagnant.

  4. #4
    Registered User ianr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chiltern Riviera
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Ernest View Post
    Intel unveiled a new High End Desktop CPU that can apparently run stable at 5GHz on all 56 threads.
    https://www.techpowerup.com/244853/i...hedt-processor

    AMD announced a 2nd generation Threadripper with 32 cores/64 threads
    https://www.techpowerup.com/244901/a...-with-32-cores

    If you find a picture of Intel showing it, the CHILLER (Cooler) is BIGGER

    than everything else size-wise & is separate by the side & looks like a

    '90's air con unit (lol) Early days bad Promo is this photo.

    I wouldn't have unveiled that, more of a lash up?
    Last edited by ianr; 06-06-2018 at 09:33 AM.

  5. #5
    Idle curiosity. Any system built around either of these CPUs is way beyond "weekend hobbyist", and will cost mucho dinero. I was under the impression that an Octane-based GPU rendering system with (a) fairly high-end video card(s) could blow a CPU-based rendering system out of the water without breathing hard.

    Obviously, beyond bragging rights, throughput is the goal, but if you need that much throughput, why not use a commercial rendering farm?

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    Idle curiosity. Any system built around either of these CPUs is way beyond "weekend hobbyist", and will cost mucho dinero. I was under the impression that an Octane-based GPU rendering system with (a) fairly high-end video card(s) could blow a CPU-based rendering system out of the water without breathing hard.

    Obviously, beyond bragging rights, throughput is the goal, but if you need that much throughput, why not use a commercial rendering farm?
    Depending on how you setup Octane you certainly can blow ANY CPU out of the water with one to two High End GPU's. The cost of those gpu's are equal or much less than any top end CPU. However if you want full radiosity renders I'm thinking until noise reduction comes along (time will tell with Octane 4) it may still be good for CPU rendering.

    I can say definitivly that exterior (direct lighting) will probably never catch up on CPU side. I can render 1080P exterior scenes with 10's of 100's of millions of poly's (think large city with trees plants etc.) in mins a frame. Octane is brilliant for DL setups. I use ambient occlusion for interiors, can't get good fast full radiosity renders even with two 1080 ti's still.... I never have frames of full HD take longer than 3-5 mins ever. Typically 1-2 mins.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ianr View Post
    If you find a picture of Intel showing it, the CHILLER (Cooler) is BIGGER

    than everything else size-wise & is separate by the side & looks like a

    '90's air con unit (lol) Early days bad Promo is this photo.

    I wouldn't have unveiled that, more of a lash up?
    There are comparison pictures at
    https://www.hardocp.com/news/2018/06...el_at_computex

  8. #8
    These announcements cement me in the CPU rendering camp. I really like the sound of a 64 thread ThreadRipper. It's getting close to that time again when I need to think about my next workstation and this will likely be the right time to do it for me. Maybe I will finally move my production work to LW 2018 with these extra CPU threads as well.
    Last edited by Nicolas Jordan; 06-06-2018 at 06:35 PM.
    https://www.dynamicrenderings.com/

    Hardware Specs: i7 4930K, 32 GB, Windows 10, Nvidia GTX 770 2GB

  9. #9
    Super Member Qexit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Warrington, UK
    Posts
    973
    So who's entering this Intel competition for a chance to win a slightly less powerful cpu off them ?

    https://game.intel.com/8086sweepstakes/gb/
    Kevin F Stubbs

    Remember...one size does NOT fit all

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Qexit View Post
    So who's entering this Intel competition for a chance to win a slightly less powerful cpu off them ?

    https://game.intel.com/8086sweepstakes/gb/
    What does this "free" cpu fit into?

  11. #11
    Super Member Qexit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Warrington, UK
    Posts
    973
    Quote Originally Posted by paulk View Post
    What does this "free" cpu fit into?
    Apparently an LGA1151 socket. See here for full details:

    https://newsroom.intel.com/news/inte...86k-processor/
    Kevin F Stubbs

    Remember...one size does NOT fit all

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •