Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 17 of 17

Thread: nevron vs. ipi motion capture ?

  1. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    I have to agree with a previous post that the Nevron with live capture was less than great results. Feet and hands twisted out of shape. I switched to ipisoft and the capture is far more accurate. I then imported the motion file as bvh into LW and used Nevron to retarget. This worked much better for me.

  2. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    188
    I use Ipisoft for capture and export it as a BVH file into LW and then manually retargeted the bones and saved it as a general BVH setup, as the normal BVH preset doesn't recognise it. This works great for me and I can fine tune it in LW. Ipisoft gives much better capture results even with a single Kinect. I am awaiting arrival of a second Kinect so I can get even better results.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Sorry just realised I posted twice on this Lol.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •