Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Which way is the front?

  1. #1
    Registered User GuanoLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    22

    Which way is the front?

    This may sound like a stupid question, but I have been using Lightwave for years and this still confuses me.

    When I open up Modeller, and start creating, I have no idea which way around the views are facing. I assume that +Z is meant to be the front of my model, yet the Perspective view default always shows the back of it. And when I load it into Layout, the camera is also looking at its back.

    This is important to know because when animating the model using the Motion option of Orient to Path, the forward direction has to be right.

    Why would objects facing forward be faced away from the camera? What is the rationale behind this?

    And can I set up my viewports so they are oriented in a more logical fashion when I begin?

  2. #2
    Registered User AdamAvenali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    778
    yeah i have found that odd as well, but i noticed i naturally model my characters facing -Z for some reason, so it just works out for me.

  3. #3
    You can set your Z viewport so the model faces you (front) but then you''ll have to change Right to Left and Top to Bottom so that the viewports line up properlly.
    I think this happens because 3D apps views were thought like the american way of opening the projections cube. I like more the european way, but there no way to acomplish it in the applications since they line up the info acording to the american way.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Registered User GuanoLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    22
    Ah, that may be it.

    I think I learned the same way as you, probiner, down here in the Antipodes (New Zealand/Australia). I'm looking at it like it's within a cube, and they are probably thinking in terms of unfolding the cube, so they face outwards and away.

    I have reoriented the viewports, but the perspective view can't change except by hand.

  5. #5
    Here is the reasoning behind why the viewport is the way it is.
    When you model a character, If I say raise the right hand... if it is facing the +Z then the hand on the right side of the character is raised.

    If you model the character facing the -z then all of that stuff is backwards and can get confusing.

  6. #6
    Maybe i'm wrong but from what i remember is something like this.



    So European way for me is way more natural cause the cube is opened from inside.
    So if you have an object over a sheet of paper you just roll the object over the sheet and you have the projections. The american way would be like rolling the object behind the paper.

    You can't setup the european style in a system that lines up like the american one. Shame =\

    Cheers
    Last edited by probiner; 10-25-2009 at 10:02 PM.

  7. #7
    Registered User GuanoLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Jockomo View Post
    If you model the character facing the -z then all of that stuff is backwards and can get confusing.
    I hope that's not really the reason, because that assumes a lowest common denominator that is unwarranted.

    I would have thought anybody who can use 3D graphics software can orient things around in their head with ease.

  8. #8
    Worms no more! Free fun! Dodgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    8,274
    I always point objects facing towards the +Z axis, if only because the Target function uses the +Z direction as the direction it points along. So a car will face the right direction if it's got a Target set.
    Push the software, don't let it push YOU!
    My own plugins and work:www.mikegreen.name
    LaptopSetup:corei7 2.4GHz nvidia GT 650M 8Gig win8 64
    WorkSetup:core i7 3.4Ghz nvidia Quadro 2000 12Gig Ram Win7

  9. #9
    What Dodgy said GuanoLad.

    Belive me i tryed to make it more natural, but after you'll understand you're just looking for complications.

    I wish 3D applications would let you choose wich style you want cause european is way more intuitive and natural i think. But since it's like this you better get used to.

    Cheers

  10. #10
    Registered User GuanoLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    22
    Yes, when Targets and Motion Paths started to be important to me, that's when I began to get confused by how it was set out.

    A little bit frustrating, but nothing to get excited about, I suppose.

  11. #11
    There's a simpler way to understand this - cameras get animated too, so they face +Z for the same reason characters need to be, for the animation programming to work correctly. So if they're both facing the proper direction, the camera will be looking at the character's back when loaded into a default scene.

    The view in Modeler is not a camera and doesn't get animated, so it's set up to look at what should be the front of your model.
    Confirmed -
    No Weapons of Mass Destruction
    or links to Al Queda or 9/11. (Sep. 2003)

  12. #12
    Registered User GuanoLad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    22
    Except it doesn't. Modeller's perspective view defaults to looking at the back of the model.

    And even if that is the logic behind it, it hasn't been thought through very well.

  13. #13
    The reason is because everything including the camera in Layout has to default to the same +Z orientation for targeting and other things. If for instance you had an arrow and the camera was behind it in a POV shot parented to the arrow as it flies through the air toward the target, both the camera and the arrow would likely have some kind of targeting or "align to" activated. So with "align to" the arrow will face toward the positive direction of the path even if the path itself is not facing in the Z direction, the positive direction of the path will determine where the arrow is facing and it will take the object orientation data as the reference for the targeting. Whatever is facing in the +Z will point toward the target.

    Since the camera also will likely be targeted you will have consistency. This is why the camera defaults to pointing down the Z direction. To keep all things consistant, the persperctive view in modeler also defaults to this orientation.

    It is not intuitive when you are modeling, it only makes sense once you start animating and for this reason there is nothing stopping you from simply modeling it backwards and then flip it for the final version. That is what I ususally do.

  14. #14
    Amused
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Keeping Austin weird
    Posts
    1,322
    I asked this question years ago and I think the answer then was that it had always been that way.

    The next best answer was that it had to be that way because of the way inverse kinematics work.

  15. #15
    It's like you said Surrealist, it makes sense for animation. Very few for modeling (wich is GuanoLad concern i think).

    If you want to draw the projections of a cuboid in a paper is rather simple roll it over the paper and as it rolls you get the projections.
    American projection method it's like picking the object and make a decal or transfer to the the paper as you roll it (so what you have to draw is facing the paper and not you). But if you put the face you want to draw/model facing you, the roll gets unatural like in the image above.

    So European method might be more natural: As you roll the object you get the projections and you see the face you want to draw/model



    I -guess- every software uses American method and no one is going to change that even as an option (wich would be cool).

    So after trying, again, to make European fit American i came to this.
    Though you are seeing the Bottom of your model it's quite easy to forget that at treat it has top. Altough the Front/"Top" alignment is ok the orientation is not, but i think mentally it might work. Especially because now you have Front =)
    You guys see any issues with this?



    Cheers

    PS: Oh my bad, GuanoLad, is concerned about Layout -_-'
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	projection-cube.gif 
Views:	412 
Size:	400.2 KB 
ID:	78829  
    Last edited by probiner; 10-29-2009 at 07:03 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •