Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: 1 frame - 16 hours to render.....

  1. #1
    Newbie Member csoars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    73

    1 frame - 16 hours to render.....

    See my little picture on the left - it is a render of a pile of wine glasses and a half filled bottle on a reflective table. When I first got LW it was the first thing I did (actually it was a tutorial for one glass but, as usual I got carried away)

    I planned to have the camera do a sweep - about a 8 second avi.

    However, to get the quality right I had to set it to pass 5 times then I rendered one frame and that took 16 hours. There is a lot of glass here and a lot of reflection but I was shocked by how long it took.

    If I had let it go for the 8 second clip it would have taken 130 odd days to render.

    Question - I really wanted a high quality image but is this normal?
    Last edited by csoars; 09-04-2007 at 04:13 AM.

  2. #2
    Registered User mrunion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Jonesborough, TN
    Posts
    582
    Yup, this can be completely normal. It does depend on some of your settings, and pushing some of them around (ray recursion) may help some. But yeah, alot of glass, reflection and refraction equals mondo render times.
    Thanx,
    Matt

    (I will come back to LightWave3D when the support Linux. Linux isn't going anywhere, guys. Time to accept it!)

  3. #3
    Registered User Bliz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    280
    Put the scene in a box or room and see if that helps. All those rays are probably travelling too far into the void.
    Cheers,
    Bliz::..

    My homepage
    www.anthonyrosbottom.artstation.com

  4. #4
    Unregistered Guest Sarford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    1,187
    You are not using radiosity are you? That would be a total waste of time with a black background.

    Part of the trick with 3D is not to make it 'mathematicaly' right but to make it 'look' right. Lots of things you can do to shave off rendering times. Look at some works of Ceasar Montero, his work looks very photorealistic yet he never uses radiosity or any other fancy stuff. Knowing what to light and how to light can save you heaps of rendertime...

  5. #5
    Heffalump
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Away
    Posts
    3,897
    Check your raytrace recursion level. You might be able to dial it down without losing too much from the final image. It should help with the render time.
    Inactive.

  6. #6
    If the camera will be in motion, it's probably not necessary to do as many passes for the moving frames. Just do the full quality render for the beginning and ending frames.
    Between the eyes and ears there lie the sounds of color and the light of a sigh.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester New York
    Posts
    758
    Is that the actual size image you rendered? ('cause it's super tiny) I wouldn't mind seeing a larger version. I can't see a thing in it (it's 133x100!!) let's get an idea of what you're working with

    Casey

  8. #8
    Unless you're using Radiosity, I'm sure it's the ray recursion that's slowing things down. Try it at about 8. I've always found the default 16 to be unneccessarily high, it starts to become redundant or even too many bounces. You can try lower than 8, but the lower you go, the more reflections you lose, and transparency can become cloudy or black, so do test renders if you want to find the fastest render for the quality you want.
    Last edited by toby; 09-21-2006 at 11:38 AM.
    Confirmed -
    No Weapons of Mass Destruction
    or links to Al Queda or 9/11. (Sep. 2003)

  9. #9
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560
    Is this LW 9?
    If so, are you using the perspective or the classic camera?
    Use the perspective...
    tone down ray recursions, as mentioned.
    Don't use radiosity for this...

  10. #10
    Newbie Member csoars's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    73
    Thanks guys - I will try some of these things. Sorry abotu the image size - I accidently posted my little ID image (which is the same). Here is the full image.

    Colin
    Last edited by csoars; 09-04-2007 at 04:13 AM.

  11. #11
    oooh...specularity... baaad.... incidence angle... gooood... a good environment for the reflections is critical. HDRs work great for this.
    notice the way that the glasses, particularly the one on it's side, look like they're full of water, or solid glass; that's what will be fixed by proper refraction/air polygons.
    Confirmed -
    No Weapons of Mass Destruction
    or links to Al Queda or 9/11. (Sep. 2003)

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester New York
    Posts
    758
    Anyone got any tips or a setup for incident angle reflection? I've got a outdoor building scene and I can't get the reflection right on the windows but I'm slightly clueless about IA.


    Casey
    (now, if I press this...)

  13. #13
    Registered User borkus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    augusta, me
    Posts
    675
    neverko, really cool website you posted. very cool find

  14. #14
    Husband, Father of 5 nthused's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Memphis, TN, USA
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by Lottmedia
    Anyone got any tips or a setup for incident angle reflection? I've got a outdoor building scene and I can't get the reflection right on the windows but I'm slightly clueless about IA.


    Casey
    (now, if I press this...)
    Try 15 to 20 percent at the 90 degree (directly facing you - perpendicular) and 98 percent at the 0 degree mark. Set it opposite for the transparency - 98 percent at 90 degrees and zero to 10 percent at 0 degrees. This is where FPrime has REALLY helped me - takes the pain from testing the surface settings.

    Have fun.
    Allen Bussell

  15. #15
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560
    csoars:
    Blurred reflection is killing you too... perhaps your quality level is set a bit high.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •