Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Massive Emitter birth rate for relatively few particles?

  1. #1

    Massive Emitter birth rate for relatively few particles?

    Hi there.
    This is a kind of general question about Particles / voxels. I have used them a few times with mixed results. I seem to have to put in an enormous 'Birth Rate' of 200000 particles to get only a couple of hundred particles to appear on my object. Iím using them mainly to make a spritzing effect of water droplets on a bottle or can. Iím not trying to animate them yet, just for a single hi resolution render for print work. They look great when theyíre there but itís just that there are so few of them. Also, is there a way of stopping the particles bunching up in areas of the object that have a high poly count? Can they be spread out evenly over the object?
    The user manual has got me so far but need some more guidance. Iíve looked through various websites to try to track down an idiots guide to particles or set of basic rules to stick by when setting them up but canít find any. I know theyíre pretty complex and Iím only touching the surface but I get the feeling that IĎm not using them correctly and getting into bad habits already.

    Anyway, hope this makes sense. Any help would be great.

    Thanks.

    Icegiant.

  2. #2
    Watch out for the bull! -NG-'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Rotterdam NL
    Posts
    163
    look at the life time of the particles and the particle limit tab. If your birthrate is set to 2000 and your limit is 1000, the emitter will only generate 1000 particles.

    The birthrate is just how many particles per(designated unit)it generates.
    -----------------------------------------------
    A computer never makes a mistake, it's the human that does.

    Beginning 3D Artist.
    Intermediate 2D Artist.

  3. #3
    Particle in 3-D space.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    909
    Set Particle Limit to 200.000, that should help.
    Here I have 20.000 particles flying off. 200.000 was a little to much to handle for my pc

    Edit: Set Lifetime to 0 and they will live forever! Also, you can have a object as a emitter-Nozzle-Object something...try it out!
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Tiger; 05-05-2005 at 09:14 AM.
    Vista Home Premium Service pack 1
    Albatron GF8800GTS 640MB
    Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2,4GHz
    Samsung HD321KJ 300GB
    Asus P5B i965P
    2 1024MB DDR2 PC2-4200 533MHz









    .

  4. #4

    Smile

    Thanks a million guys!

    It was my Particle Life Time that was the fix.
    Changing it gave me the results I was looking for, setting it to zero gave me loads.
    I had 187 particles, now I have 20,000!

    Thanks again for the time, itís really appreciated.


    Icegiant.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #5
    Particle in 3-D space.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    909
    Nice waterdropps there
    Vista Home Premium Service pack 1
    Albatron GF8800GTS 640MB
    Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2,4GHz
    Samsung HD321KJ 300GB
    Asus P5B i965P
    2 1024MB DDR2 PC2-4200 533MHz









    .

  6. #6
    Super Member SplineGod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Hastings, New Zealand
    Posts
    7,731
    I would probably avoid using particles for something like this and use textures to control the generation of HVs on the surface.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •