Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Native rigging/FK/IK vs. 3rd party?

  1. #1

    Question Native rigging/FK/IK vs. 3rd party?

    Let me just preface this by saying that I'm not trying to start a "don't call my baby ugly" thread, but I'm starting to dive into learning character rigging and animation and am looking for some straight truths about third party offerings. Namely, I'm interested in knowing what a solution like messiah:animate or MotionBuilder brings to the table that LW[8] can't do natively. LW's bones/skelegons, weight maps, and FK/IK seem quite powerful to me. So what do messiah and MotionBuilder do better, as they're obviously popular tools used even by LW artists?

    Thanks in advance for the info.

  2. #2
    Steam username: Carm3D Carm3D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,351
    I've never used Motion Builder but I've heard good things about it.

    Messiah I used. Some parts of it were more advanced than LW.. The ability to re-arrange the order of when expressions (including IK) happen is very VERY cool. And Messiah is extremely fast.

    I'm not a big fan of Messiah's graph editor and it's MetaEffector system really pales in comparison to using LW's native weightmaps.

    I eventually sold Messiah and I'm back to LW.. But I am looking closely at Cinema4D.
    Carm
    Carm3D.com
    vimeo.com/carm3d

    "All war is deception." - Sun Tzu

  3. #3
    Lightwave on the surface looks rather weak for character animation.
    There is no obvious way of setting up things like IK/FK blending etc..
    It also has quirky tools like Ik booster which are not properly explained and seem of little use.
    BUT.. with a bit of ingenuity, Lightwave is actually very capable of supporting very good rigs to animate with. you just have to be a bit ingenious to put them together.
    I used to use messiah. In fact, some of my messiah work is used on PMG's site to promote the software, but I don't use it anymore. I find that lightwave 8 has enough really good tools to do the job. (although when I first got 8 I was very disappointed indeed and nearly went over to XSI.. It took a while to see how many of the features could be used)
    I think, as Carm3d said.. expressions and speed are the main advantages.
    But then, they dont have metalink and hardlink, which I couldn't do without now.

  4. #4
    Steam username: Carm3D Carm3D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    2,351
    Yes I use FXMetaLink and it's very good. I haven't figured out how to use HardLink yet.
    Carm
    Carm3D.com
    vimeo.com/carm3d

    "All war is deception." - Sun Tzu

  5. #5
    Worms no more! Free fun! Dodgy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    8,282
    Hardlink is just the same as metalink, but works better for things made up of lots of smaller non-flexible things like armour plate or cuffs etc. I think it's amazing
    Push the software, don't let it push YOU!
    My own plugins and work:www.mikegreen.name
    LaptopSetup:corei7 2.4GHz nvidia GT 650M 8Gig win8 64
    WorkSetup:core i7 3.4Ghz nvidia Quadro 2000 12Gig Ram Win7

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •