Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 24

Thread: New mac pro

  1. #1
    Angry Mac User Otterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    867

    New mac pro

    https://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

    been waiting for this news for a longtime.

    Heres the spec...What do you think? Capable machine?

    https://www.apple.com/mac-pro/specs/

    Im a bit disappointed they have stayed with AMD cards, so probably not compatible with much!

    AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

  2. #2
    Lava Lamp Technician 3D Kiwi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, West Island of New Zealand
    Posts
    614
    I saw this, looks like you can spec it out well but surely you could spec out a pc with similar performance for a lot less.
    And are mac users really that rough on their computers that they have to build it like a tank?

    I had an old dell machine which I shipped from NZ to Australia and it got bashed around, kept going with out any worries for about 4 years after that until i Upgraded.

  3. #3
    •••••••••••••••••••• rsfd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Europe, de
    Posts
    1,305
    Quote Originally Posted by Otterman View Post

    ..What do you think? Capable machine?
    I'd say every part of it is state of the art (and probably even beyond)

    Quote Originally Posted by Otterman View Post

    …Im a bit disappointed they have stayed with AMD cards, so probably not compatible with much!…
    It's probably not that bad: Redshift and Octane are coming to the '19 Mac Pro with Metal-based versions.
    Others *should* follow as Metal is the future for macOS, breaking Nvidia's proprietary CUDA dominance somehow.

    My concerns would be that many of the other big companies won't deliver in time and only pay lip service right now.
    (Do you remember Foundry's "Modo on Metal" presentation some years ago? Afaik, nothing has happened since then).

  4. #4
    Newbie Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Westchester NY.
    Posts
    43
    Starting at $6,000 for 8 core's 16 threads

    not including the $5,000 monitor and if you need it the $1,000 stand for it.


    You would have to think what function would this serve other than peace of mind because its not cost effective.

  5. #5
    Registered User ianr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Chiltern Riviera
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by Strider_X View Post
    Starting at $6,000 for 8 core's 16 threads

    not including the $5,000 monitor and if you need it the $1,000 stand for it.


    You would have to think what function would this serve other than peace of mind because its not cost effective.


    The monitor looks juicy, against film industry on-set reference options,and it seems a good price.

    Yes to purhase, only if doing hi- grade work.( Netflix is now only commissioning 6k work from now.)

    So running it on a Win OS (treadripper or Intel) with a GC-Alpine Ridge 2.0 Thunderbolt 3 Card might be interesting?


    http://www.theverge.com/2019/6/3/186...-hdr-wwdc-2019
    Last edited by ianr; 06-04-2019 at 08:44 AM.

  6. #6
    Angry Mac User Otterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    867
    Thats interesting you say that. Ive been stuck with my 12 core mac bin for way too long and I could never leverage the duel AMD firepro cards. No vray, octane or after effects compatibility. Now I want to really dip my toe into GPU rendering and UE4 I was all set to jump over to PC and Nvidia RTX. Now I don't know e=with this new Mac Pro

  7. #7
    Big fan of coffee raw-m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,339
    The monitor is way out of my league but really like this Mac Pro. Apple is making all their money upfront as they won’t make much from it in the long term if it’s users can update it themselves. Trouble is the base config seems to be less powerful than an iMac Pro so will be judging when released/reviews are in.

  8. #8
    ack ack Markc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,370
    Yep, the base model seems damn pricey for what you get, even though it has massive upgrade potential.
    You should at least get a 1tb ssd for that price.
    I hate to think what the other cpu options are going to be priced at.
    Mac Pro (2010) OSX 10.13 RX580 Pulse LW2019

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    91
    Just going to go ahead and explain the same thing I've explained to a bunch of people who love to hate on Apple and their seemingly ludicrous pricing.

    It's server hardware, and server hardware in general is a lot more expensive since they come with a whole lot of bells and whistles not available in typical consumer cpus. Just take a look at any workstation branded pc for any other competitor such as Dell, HP etc etc. Prices for actual workstations are that sky high. (Just to buy the 8-core xeon chip that is in the Mac Pro costs like 3000 usd if not more)

    It's not meant for mere mortals such as freelancers working from home or even smaller firms.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Right here
    Posts
    1,535
    The base model for $6k is nothing outstanding and overpriced compared to PC hardware with similar / better performance.

    There are estimations for a MacPro top model to exceed $50'000.

    There are few to none benefits in using ECC RAM for desktop applications in my opinion. Flipped bits in well designed systems with good thermals and RAM timings are very rare. Applications hardly run any more stable because of it. And there are PC workstations with Xeon CPUs and ECC RAM available too of course (but also more expensive than consumer hardware).

    It's doubtful that it would outperform a reasonable priced PC with a Gen3 top end threadripper system with a couple of Titan RTX cards, even if Redshift and Octane offer AMD GPU support. It will take time to optimize the path-/raytracing engines for AMD tech and in the past OpenCL was about half as fast then CUDA and generally much faster on NVidia hardware.

    I use a MacBook Pro 15" myself for non 3D work and love it but 20-50k for a Mac that doesn't even support all 3D software and plugins, I don't know...

    Besides that I find the new design horrible.

  11. #11
    Angry Mac User Otterman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    867
    Well the fact Octane have revealed mac support, it just got a whole lot more interesting. I had gone down the Maya/vary route but now I could potentially use Maya AND Lightwave with Octane on a new mac. Oo exciting!

  12. #12
    Big fan of coffee raw-m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,339
    On a related note, Catalina - anyone know if LW will run at all with OpenGL being depreciated? Can’t find any details on it.

  13. #13
    Registered User speismonqui's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Panama
    Posts
    522
    Quote Originally Posted by Morgan Nilsson View Post
    Just to buy the 8-core xeon chip that is in the Mac Pro costs like 3000 usd if not more
    That doesn't make sense, just the CPU costs half the total computer?

    I found this and if it's true then the 8 core will cost $750 (3.5 GHz base model W-3223)
    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/in...pus,39575.html

    This guy thinks the CPU will be a variant of the Xeon W-2145 which costs roughly $1200 (the other 8 core in the table in the link above - W-3225)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PPiEpSMkzoo
    Dell XPS8700 Quad Core i7 [email protected] - 16 GB DDR3 - GeForce GTX 750ti - Windows 10

  14. #14
    Super Member CaptainMarlowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Belfort, France
    Posts
    1,846
    Quote Originally Posted by Otterman View Post
    Thats interesting you say that. Ive been stuck with my 12 core mac bin for way too long and I could never leverage the duel AMD firepro cards. No vray, octane or after effects compatibility. Now I want to really dip my toe into GPU rendering and UE4 I was all set to jump over to PC and Nvidia RTX. Now I don't know e=with this new Mac Pro
    I still have a 6-core nMP, and as a hobbyist, I won’t buy a new MacPro, for sure. I will certainly upgrade my CPU for a 10-core, and as for GPU, I’m tempted to add a radeon VII in a razer core X. Since Unreal (and TM) is Metal compliant, I think it will be a huge progress compared to my current D500s. In the long term, I’m afraid I’ll have to switch to PC or go the hackintosh route.

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    a place
    Posts
    1,855
    Mac Pro, isn't that an oxymoron ?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •