Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Modo-volumetric Item

  1. #1
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103

    Modo-volumetric Item

    Ivé been wanting to dig in to how Modo volumetric Item works etc...so I am discussing this on a thread over at luxology.

    Now ...I saw this hand which looks sweet, and I can see how valuable modoīs new volumetrics can be for clouds, geometric shapes can be made volume item.

    hereīs the hand image...
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	22714_handCloud.JPG 
Views:	5503 
Size:	125.5 KB 
ID:	111600
    also available as lux scenefile in the thread link below, and thereīs a short tute description if you would want to test modo out, very short demo limit period for it though unfortunatly.
    http://forums.luxology.com/topic.aspx?f=32&t=67635

    hereīs the thread I started to find out more about modos volumetrics.
    http://forums.luxology.com/topic.asp...t=73579&page=0

    seems to render very fast if you look at Brad Peeblers volume item video, at least in preview, also it seems to blend much smoother, even though there isnīt any blending mode for particles.
    Hereīs a quote from Andrew Helmer at the lux forums regarding modo not using rayleigh scattering...

    "Actually, Rayleigh scattering is not very good for clouds, because Rayleigh scattering only applies for small particles, whereas water droplets (clouds) are fairly large particles. For clouds I think it's most common to use Henyey-Greenstein scattering (which is basically what modo uses), although I think Lorenz-Mie scattering can also be used."
    shadow maps are also used.

    Now... I hope improvements in hypervoxels follows this modo volumetric aproach, Im kind of a little fed up not getting what I want with them for clouds really...think Ivé been pushing them inside out to the most by now.

    Michael

  2. #2
    Red Mage Celshader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Burbank, California
    Posts
    1,817
    Quote Originally Posted by prometheus View Post
    Now... I hope improvements in hypervoxels follows this modo volumetric aproach, Im kind of a little fed up not getting what I want with them for clouds really...think Ivé been pushing them inside out to the most by now.
    Could Volumedic CE do this?
    Last edited by Celshader; 02-15-2013 at 08:16 PM.
    Jen's 3D -- LightWave stuff.
    Jen's 2D -- my comic book.

    Python is my smashing board. LightWave is my S.M.A.K.

  3. #3
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Celshader View Post
    Could Volumedic CE do this?
    I think you can make mesh a volumetric object with that, though I havenīt seen any good example of it, elmar posted some samples of clouds..but that was a little different, and I didnīt like the
    volumetrics from that actually.
    We really need this inside of hypervoxel rewritten or improved somehow, otherwise it fails to compete with pyrocluster, modo volumetrics, vue metaspheres, and the king of them..houdini.

    you can see how fast modo renders the volume item, also..take a look at how the volume blends..seems much smoother than hypervoxels, I do not know why and how that is, maybe because of the different lighting model...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEghi7jkvbQ

    hereīs the cloud fly through, a little better work on the air/sky here..I think it is to dark and too little scattering, then reduce the amount of texture cut throuhg, and remove the lower cllipping on the whole cloud, then it would look really great...
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MXug_ZGUMY

    the issue with hypervoxels hypertextures..even using only one null item, it is that hypertexture is cutting and also texturing density almost equally over the whole volume..but for real clouds and smoother ones, you would mostly like smoother overall look and texture more affecting the rim edges, that depends sometimes on lighting angles though.

    you can improve it by using local density on dissolve channels of texture value..but there is no way to adjust the hypertexture to be smooth like that.
    Vue clouds does a quite good job with it, but that isnīt perfect either.

    sample image link..gardner clouds just a fast setup and compare, right image smoothed out with photoshop perhaps too much, but something in between is what looks best I think.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	smoothing of density.jpg 
Views:	969 
Size:	125.2 KB 
ID:	111602


    1.the first thing would be to get volume item to hypervoxels, I ranted about that ages ago refering to houdini and implicit surfaces to convert geometry to volumes, and now modo got something like it.
    2. next ..get shadow maps in there.
    3. fix volume blending mode when using particle or nulls together, a proper tension blending ala metablob is needed
    4. do check in to a better illumination models for clouds, suggestion would be to keep rayleigh as an option.

    Do that And we are on the fly to great clouds

    Michael

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    1,140
    Good thread and interesting subject. Some of these look almost good or better than the Terragen 2 clouds.
    "Once one can articulate an important idea into a concise statement, then one can use the statement and not have to have the fear of changing behavior." - Ed Catmull on Pixar creativity

  5. #5
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by rcallicotte View Post
    Good thread and interesting subject. Some of these look almost good or better than the Terragen 2 clouds.

    which images? clips? looks as good as terragen?

    Michael

  6. #6
    Lightwave junkie stevecullum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Reading UK
    Posts
    3,137
    geometric shapes can be made volume item.
    You can sort of do goemetric shapes in LW - not exactly like the modo version and my shading sucks compared to those gardner clouds samples!

    More effort needed....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HVHand.jpg 
Views:	440 
Size:	60.6 KB 
ID:	111658  
    i7 X3930/32GB/Quadro 4000

  7. #7
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by stevecullum View Post
    You can sort of do goemetric shapes in LW - not exactly like the modo version and my shading sucks compared to those gardner clouds samples!

    More effort needed....
    Well...sort of, not volumetric objects truly, only point vertices and point clusters, and the local density gives the typical shading around each point in space and next to each other they are giving a sharp round cut.
    Thatīs why we should rant to have true geometry volumetrics avoiding such issues.

    on that hand sample...how did you make the hand shape? just curious if you added it to vertices, or if you used the fill solid tool? the fill solid tool letīs you fill geometry with points, but at the end of the day, most
    of us will have it the same look as you with blobby hvīs.

    Try and use beer illumination, I think that would ease up on the scattering and make the shading a little better.

    By the way, if you use sprites instead, you would get a much better volume blending, and make sure points are sort of quantized, that is sort of fixed distance between every point, the
    human eye sees difference much clearer than fixed patterns, ergo your eyes are fooled that way.
    you could set up a null and luminosity gradients based on that to give appareance of volume on the sprites.
    I think you might be able to bake luminosity too somehow and apply as vertex map ..or something?

    I recall trying houdini and just create a shape, make it volumetric..voila instant volume shape from which you could add fractal noise, I believe it has good ways to control edge rim of the volume to have more
    noise and less withing the volume.
    No wonder Houdini has been one of the top tools for superman fly through clouds, or time machine or airline commercials.

    I saw a tutorial once for old Houdini using image3d rendering to disc and metaballs on to L-systems, and the level of control for density and turbulence to create
    a mushroom cloud was sweet, though I believe it is more common now to use true full volumetrics nowadays in houdini instead of image3d.

    If modo has just as sweet sky like dponīts sunsky, then modo will be showcasing very very nice clouds soon.
    Would like to get my hands on modo demo...but Ive been reluctant due to itīs frankly lousy demo period and limit of 15 days.

    Michael

  8. #8
    Yes, you can do this with a feature in VoluMedic. Apply the Complex Object Custom Object plugin to a polygon object and make the object 100% transparent.
    Then you can just use the complex object as usual.
    Yes, my Avatar shows a volume rendering...
    VoluMedic Creative Edition only USD 299 !
    www.volumedic.com

  9. #9
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Elmar Moelzer View Post
    Yes, you can do this with a feature in VoluMedic. Apply the Complex Object Custom Object plugin to a polygon object and make the object 100% transparent.
    Then you can just use the complex object as usual.
    And that is featured in the CE version and demo version too?

    curious though about illumination model within volumedic, also how it would be possible to add noise/fractal within that geometry volume shape, preferably controlable to have
    more noise at the geometry boundary edges or vice versa, to get good cloud results I can imagine a need to control volume thickness in the same manner too.

    As for hypervoxels we do have a thickness control texture channel, but that hasnīt been working ever as I recall, at least there isnīt any decent gradient controller for that.

    Migth test volumedic again, had some issues with it after installing with menus, and lack of datasets brought lack of interest in it, But please inform about the mentioned above regarding if
    it is featured in those versions?

    I noticed a new houdini release with special cloudFX tools based on open vdb & sculpting tools.
    http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?opti...2445&Itemid=66

    if volumedic can display equally nice scattering of light and shades as hypervoxels, it would be very interesting, nothing wrong with
    dpont sunsky and sunlight with hypervoxels..see images.

    Michael
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Dpont sunsky and hypervoxels for clouds.jpg 
Views:	524 
Size:	620.6 KB 
ID:	112733  

  10. #10
    Robert Ireland bobakabob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Nottingham UK
    Posts
    2,757
    Agree with Michael, it would be good to see Hypervoxels updated in Lightwave.

    Elmar, any chance of seeing some Volumedic clouds or particle effects?
    Art and photography Flickr site
    Animation, facial rigging, modelling ArtStation
    Assorted animations Robert Ireland

  11. #11
    Senior Constrictor Netvudu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Barcelona, Spain
    Posts
    928
    Quote Originally Posted by prometheus View Post
    We really need this inside of hypervoxel rewritten or improved somehow, otherwise it fails to compete with pyrocluster, modo volumetrics, vue metaspheres, and the king of them..houdini.
    I know Iīm not helping,but seriously, volumetric clouds in the new CloudFX in Houdini 12.5 is so easy is not even fun. Weīve been loosing heaps of time...
    3d animation? Hah! Did you take a look through your window?thereīs plenty of it...and pre-rendered!!

  12. #12
    Super Member geo_n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    jpn
    Posts
    4,677
    Modo particle sculpting looks pretty easy to use. Possibility of sculpting clouds with familiar modelling tools.
    Extremely tempted to get a copy of modo since the learning curve is much easier than other appz.

  13. #13
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Netvudu View Post
    I know Iīm not helping,but seriously, volumetric clouds in the new CloudFX in Houdini 12.5 is so easy is not even fun. Weīve been loosing heaps of time...
    yes I noticed the release of it and undstood that they had some serious help collaboration from ILM with this, suspect nothing beats that, however..I havenīt seen any clip of it in action, just a few images, but to see it in action would be nice, got to keep my eyes on the sidefx forums, and later download the apprentice version again, it stopped working a few versions ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by geo_n View Post
    Modo particle sculpting looks pretty easy to use. Possibility of sculpting clouds with familiar modelling tools.
    Extremely tempted to get a copy of modo since the learning curve is much easier than other appz.
    Yes...two features here that made me more and more interested of it, the volume Item from geometric shapes which the thread is about, and now these new particle implementations
    that seems to surpass Lightwave particles.
    Again as mentioned before, here we can see the importance of getting modeling core tools in layout or the scene directly to paint weights or texture density or sculpt particle clusters directly in the scene.

    A volume Item method for sculpted geometry like modo or Houdiniīs ISO offset volumetric tools/cloudFX is what needs to get in to Lightwave very soon.
    Along with a proper blend tension mode between two volumetric items, we supposly got volumetric blend mode in latest hypervoxels, but that seems like a joke really, havenīt seen anything useful with it, should be closer to the ol dynamite voxel blending mode to be correct, this will help cloud point clusters look better even though the best overall cloudscapes would probably derive from geometry shapes, and also textured based infinite cloud layers like ogo taiki had.

    Michael

  14. #14
    You can use this in LightWave, wish we had it in modo. Maybe with 701...

    Turbulence FD

  15. #15
    RETROGRADER prometheus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    sweden stockholm
    Posts
    15,103
    Quote Originally Posted by Matelot13 View Post
    You can use this in LightWave, wish we had it in modo. Maybe with 701...

    Turbulence FD
    yepp..kind of works too, not ideal though, have to check illumination model etc..and you need to specificly save out dedicated cache folder and sim the first frames for every change that is done.

    But shapewise it is very nice...but to compete we need a non simulating geometry volume based tool inside of native lightwave,(modo and houdini has it)
    It is also more cumbersome to set up with fluids and huge scale sims is a clogger.

    Ivé experimented with that before, right now I have installing issues with turbulence and will get back to that later..you can pick up a sample scene of a simple geometry shape and fluid from e here in this thread...
    http://forums.newtek.com/showthread....51#post1265151

    fluid simulation on poly plane with textured surface density, noise added with subgrid detail in different stages...
    http://forums.newtek.com/showthread....78#post1238478




    some old fluid cloud test...
    simulation progress..and vpr check.
    http://vimeo.com/38310716

    Evolution test...
    http://vimeo.com/53969414
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fluid cloud model different subgrid detail settings.jpg 
Views:	1639 
Size:	440.2 KB 
ID:	112786   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Feather cirrus.jpg 
Views:	910 
Size:	510.1 KB 
ID:	112787   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image0002_002.jpg 
Views:	673 
Size:	230.1 KB 
ID:	112794   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	image0002_008.jpg 
Views:	718 
Size:	146.5 KB 
ID:	112795   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Dpont sunsky and hypervoxels for clouds.jpg 
Views:	160 
Size:	620.6 KB 
ID:	112788  

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Tfd cloud.jpg 
Views:	221 
Size:	151.4 KB 
ID:	112789   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	skylight added.jpg 
Views:	163 
Size:	82.3 KB 
ID:	112790   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	fluid cloud model from turbulenceFD.jpg 
Views:	872 
Size:	269.4 KB 
ID:	112791   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	test 3.jpg 
Views:	239 
Size:	230.0 KB 
ID:	112792   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	plane and cloud hypervoxels compare.jpg 
Views:	248 
Size:	419.4 KB 
ID:	112793  


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •