Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Obama Particle Sweep Video

  1. #1
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560

    Obama Particle Sweep Video

    I was inspired by the particle tests done in the TurbulenceFD thread, so I made this little animation as a tryout.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gw-rgxPnw5M

    It uses two partigon emitters and a wind with a fractal procedural in their wind vector, as well as a tiny gravity.

    This is not meant to be political so much as that the image has a very nice color contrast and is quite recognizable.

    Rendered with PRblur, 12 AA, 1280x1024.

    I have attached the scene for you to pick apart. I do have to say: I am getting an error on loading these scenes back in, and the emitters become normal rather than partigon emitters, causing it to no longer render. Also, loading this scene causes it to generate all teh particles, and that's a lot. So, on even the fastest computer, it might take a while.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Obamaparticles_0500.jpg 
Views:	213 
Size:	213.9 KB 
ID:	96556  
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Exception; 07-11-2011 at 03:25 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned OnlineRender's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Glasgow , Scotland , UK
    Posts
    6,369
    LOVE IT ,thanks

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valencia
    Posts
    3,145
    Hi Tom,

    Nice animation. I think your problem with the missing objects it's that you meed a partigon object, saved on the Objects directory under your content directory and named P_Emitter.

    You can create such a partigon object on a clean scene in Layout and press CTRL + P and save it with the name P_Emitter.lwo.

    David

  4. #4
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560
    Quote Originally Posted by dballesg View Post
    Nice animation. I think your problem with the missing objects it's that you meed a partigon object, saved on the Objects directory under your content directory and named P_Emitter.

    You can create such a partigon object on a clean scene in Layout and press CTRL + P and save it with the name P_Emitter.lwo.
    Nice! That worked great, thanks!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valencia
    Posts
    3,145
    Quote Originally Posted by Exception View Post
    Nice! That worked great, thanks!
    Glad it worked!

    I just tried a clip map (a Turbulence procedural wit a high contrast and small size 100mm on each axis). And it helps to reduce the bloby aspect of the particles. In fact you can reduce the number of particles and make their pixel size bigger. That leads to faster calculation and render times!

    I just made a test frame of your animation. I changed the textures and used clips maps as I described. I didn't optimized the render times at all, 20 min for this frame. And that is using FG interpolated.

    David
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FireTest.jpg 
Views:	195 
Size:	601.9 KB 
ID:	96559  
    Last edited by dballesg; 07-11-2011 at 07:21 AM. Reason: Add the render

  6. #6
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560
    Quote Originally Posted by dballesg View Post
    Glad it worked!

    I just tried a clip map (a Turbulence procedural wit a high contrast and small size 100mm on each axis). And it helps to reduce the bloby aspect of the particles. In fact you can reduce the number of particles and make their pixel size bigger. That leads to faster calculation and render times!

    I just made a test frame of your animation. I changed the textures and used clips maps as I described. I didn't optimized the render times at all, 20 min for this frame. And that is using FG interpolated.

    David
    Nice, David,

    Yes I first had large particles too, but to get the fine-grained sandy and dynamic look, I preferred the small particles, and lots of them.

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Super Member Nangleator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    2,125
    Yeah, that's pretty groovy. I'll be using that for something soon.

    Without having downloaded the scene, I'm guessing it involves a texture with world coordinates and the camera slightly off axis, so the 3-dimensional spray of particles show some waviness in the image. (Am I wrong?)

    Makes me wonder what a nice procedural texture would look like! (Abstract, but genuinely 3D.)

    Thanks!

  9. #9
    d powerfull Of lightwave abdelkarim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    algeria
    Posts
    758
    wow great work and always be.

  10. #10
    I'm not a squirrel! Mitja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    1,431
    this was really a great idea. very interesting technique indeed!

  11. #11
    Nothing ado about much Exception's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    5,560
    Quote Originally Posted by Nangleator View Post
    Without having downloaded the scene, I'm guessing it involves a texture with world coordinates and the camera slightly off axis, so the 3-dimensional spray of particles show some waviness in the image. (Am I wrong?)
    More or less. The image is just planar mapped onto the particle surface from the same axis the camera is on, but because the parallax effect of the camera's perspective, you get the waviness, which is more apparent neart he edge than near the center because of that.

    That, and there's also an animated produral that varies the self-illumination of the particles a bit.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •