Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: nominal distance on spherical lights

  1. #1
    CG Master Lor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    North Vancouver BC, Canada
    Posts
    269

    nominal distance on spherical lights

    Hey folks. Anyone know this?

    For spherical lights using inverse square falloff, is the nominal distance measured from

    a) the pivot point
    b) the surface of the sphere
    c) 42

    Thanks

    Nick

  2. #2
    Valiant NewTeKnight Matt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas, USA
    Posts
    13,055
    Looks to me like the pivot, but could be wrong.

    (If it isn't, it should be the edge of the sphere in reality)
    UI / UX Designer @ NewTek
    __________________________________________________
    www.pixsim.co.uk : LightWave Video Tutorials & Tools


  3. #3
    Surface of the sphere. Though the bigger the sphere, the more dispersion you will have, i think. Cause if it was pivot based the last image would be black, but you can see that it's darker than the first.
    Some other experiments i did, shown the sphere's light penetrating the room's walls, but without having enough size. (1.9m sphere in a 2m room). Strange =\
    Renders with Full Precision Gamma 2.2 (for a bit more of "light" )


    Cheers



    (And again another edit)

    So i used Linear Range in the last image (cause it goes black when the range isn't enough, so, it's easier to study), but here are the same settings in Inverse Distance Square. I really don't know what to think with these...




    But to sum it up in a simple way... It's 42.
    Last edited by probiner; 02-18-2010 at 09:01 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •