PDA

View Full Version : Pre internet communications device



arnoldawson
07-23-2003, 05:50 PM
Well, a ham radio transceiver.
Needs a good crit.


http://www.illustrations.freeserve.co.uk/temporary/yaesu.jpg

Dave3D
07-23-2003, 05:54 PM
wow, very good, ultra detail, cant say out bad about it.

:D DAve

riki
07-23-2003, 07:21 PM
More grime to show that it's been well loved :)

arnoldawson
07-26-2003, 06:31 PM
Thanks guys.
Riki, there's a bucket of mud hovering over it as we speak. ;)

allaboutkeys
07-27-2003, 04:16 AM
Very impressive!

Let me just ask a newbie question: How do you get all the small labels (above the buttons and dials) in place? Is it one image for the whole front surface or several little images for the different sections?

dblanky
07-27-2003, 04:40 AM
i would just use the text tool for labels

allaboutkeys
07-27-2003, 05:02 AM
dblanky: You mean for high quality close-ups you would use the stencil tool to place text onto a surface?

arnoldawson
07-27-2003, 05:30 AM
The lettering was created in Adobe Illustrator, and stenciled on to the object using the Solid Drill tool.
Don't forget to surface the drilling objects before you stencil or you have to pick out each new poly to re-colour it, which is not much fun if you've had to triple the surface in order to stencil on it.

allaboutkeys
07-27-2003, 06:00 AM
arnoldawson: Thanks for this tip!

hrgiger
07-27-2003, 10:32 AM
Very impressive. Nice detail. I would like to see it in some kind of environment even if it were a simple desktop or whatever.

X PsychoTron X
07-27-2003, 11:42 PM
Holy crap man, looks like a picture! Very good job indeed. :)

renatolazzaroni
07-28-2003, 06:55 AM
Amazing. It's perfect, really.
And I like the title you gave to this thread :D

Renato

Rei
07-28-2003, 12:05 PM
I like it, some of the plastic kina buggs me, looks non PR, but it still is :shrug:

the handle on the side is the only thing that really looks off, i just never seen anyhting like that in RL.

starbase1
07-31-2003, 05:52 AM
Brilliant, very, very believable.

A couple of very minor things - some of the square buttons look a bit sharp edged to me - have you microbevelled them? And the cyan numberic display digits would benefit from a slight glow like effect, to make them look brighter.

Nice to see something new modelled here too!

Nick

drclare
07-31-2003, 12:36 PM
Yes, this is great modelling. I think it would benefit from a radiosity rendering. Some great lighting would make this 100% photoreal.

gnu
08-01-2003, 12:11 PM
Originally posted by Rei
I like it, some of the plastic kina buggs me, looks non PR, but it still is :shrug:

the handle on the side is the only thing that really looks off, i just never seen anyhting like that in RL.

that handle type is on tons of things. its the type that as you put your fingers under it, it lifts up and moved from a _ to a half circle shape, and back again when you let go.

a really solid model., maybe needs a little grime and some radiosity tho.

Matt
08-01-2003, 12:25 PM
excellent, very photoreal! I like seeing stuff like this!

arnoldawson
08-02-2003, 09:27 PM
Starbase. I'm interested in this microbevell. I knew that there was a feature like this in Max but wasn't aware of it in Lightwave. Can you tell me more.

Gnu. You really know you're handles. ;)

Everyone else. Thanks for the comments.

lasco
08-03-2003, 06:02 AM
congrats, very good work Arnie, as usual :)

(mmm… I'd like to see a wireframe though, just to be sure
you're not lying showing us a photo there ;)

(ps : saw you had some talks about drills of your letters,
I did'nt understood everything but remind it may be unusefull
to triple all your surfaces before a drill. Mean it can work very well
without it at the difference of the boolean. Don't ask me why I don't know
but I noticed SOMETIMES to produce the exact same shape with a foreground and
a background boolean requires a tripling while drill does'nt…)

arnoldawson
08-03-2003, 07:28 AM
Lasco. I was not suggesting that you should triple polygons everytime you boolean. In fact I try to avoid tripling wherever possible as it can create a whole lot of geometry that you don't want. Very often if your boolean doesn't work properly just cut the piece of the model that you wish to boolean in half with the knife tool and try again. It can make a lot less new polygons that way, and you avoid those nasty diagonal lines that make your wireframe harder to read.

lasco
08-03-2003, 09:36 AM
I 100% agree :)
Just few knifes are enough most of time, and WF's better looking.

PS : besides what about this WF view ???
Any chances you show us one ?

arnoldawson
08-03-2003, 09:56 AM
Well if you really want to see a wireframe then here you are. :confused:

http://www.illustrations.freeserve.co.uk/temporary/wireframe.jpg

richpr
08-03-2003, 09:57 AM
Very nice! Love the details...

lasco
08-03-2003, 10:07 AM
wow !
fantastic Arnie.
I amit for a moment I wasn't sure it was really 3D as it was
so good. The subdivision level of the buttons seems amazing but I'm sure
it's the price to pay for such a nice rendering.

congrats man !
I love this WF as much as the rendered image :)

starbase1
08-03-2003, 12:16 PM
Microbevel

Nother fancy at all - just select the blocks you want, and use the bevel tool with very small values. Probably best to practice with a simple cube first.

For example if the blocky switches are about 20mm cubes, you might want to try a bevel with an inset of 2 mm and an ofset of 1 mm, then just a 1 mm inset.

The second one stops smoothing spreading onto the whole face of the object.

Hope that helps,
Nick

arnoldawson
08-03-2003, 04:55 PM
Ah I see what you mean now Starbase.
Yes very helpful.
Thanks.