PDA

View Full Version : Linux and LW 7.5c !



garg
05-19-2003, 12:42 AM
I'm happy because finnaly I got some working results with LWSN 7.5c under linux. Now I just need to see if there is some speed difference between windows and linux :-)))

Alain Bertrand

loebek
05-19-2003, 03:30 AM
post screenshots and the bechmarks.

cu
loebek

garg
05-19-2003, 04:51 AM
Ok ! I will do it this afternoon and give back some results.

Alain

garg
05-19-2003, 10:40 AM
Ok ! I did some test and posted an example (speed and quality test)

http://www.rayserver.com/linux_win/

Every thing explained in this page.

Still I'm preaty happy...

Alain Bertrand

loebek
05-19-2003, 10:54 AM
so oeppis isch raecht cool hey!


loe begg

garg
05-19-2003, 11:36 AM
??? What ??? I did not catch what you said...

markus
05-20-2003, 12:51 PM
I would like to thank NewTek for finally creating a good readme for the Linux client!
They should have done that in the first place ;)

loebek
05-21-2003, 06:46 AM
you dont speak swiss german yet?
seulment francais?

>so oeppis isch raecht cool hey!

c'est tres cool ey!

Oculus
05-21-2003, 10:58 AM
sorry for this question but am i just a dork or is the new lwsn-package not included in the intel-update?

can't find it anywhere either :(

LSlugger
05-21-2003, 05:46 PM
In 7.5b, it was in the ZIP archive. Now it's part of the installation executable. After you install 7.5c, there should be a file called lwsn-7.5c-584.i386.rpm in LinuxScreamernet.

Oculus
05-22-2003, 11:27 AM
not with the update-executable, i got :confused:

i even searched the cab-files from installshield manually, not a trace :o

but i have this 15mb update
on filemirrors are 2 entries for the update on the newtek-ftp
one with 20mb on 15th of may
one with 15mb on 16th of may

wtf happened there? :confused:

LSlugger
05-22-2003, 06:32 PM
In case you missed my post (http://vbulletin.newtek.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=4563) in LW - Community: there are, in fact, two 7.5c patches. The new one has some documentation updates and removes the Linux renderer. It was probably a mistake.