View Full Version : 9.3 Materials test
DogBoy
08-22-2007, 10:35 AM
I recently went to the British museum for an exhibition of Contemporary Japanese Crafts.
Great exhibition and it made me want to try to recreate some of the pieces.
I ended up with this, more of a homage than an actual recreation :hey: .
FG Interp. Rad around 6 minutes each
Bytehawk
08-22-2007, 11:20 AM
nice materials.
could however use a bit more AA
DogBoy
08-22-2007, 12:30 PM
I wondered about the awful spots around the gold.
I set AA at 6, & AS 0.1. But they were still there :thumbsdow
Noticed in the "9.3 test" thread that turning on LDR helped.
So I tried that. This is the result:
Bytehawk
08-22-2007, 03:55 PM
it's the hdr map. that map creates the specular spots. They'll only disappear if you
a) blur the hdr significantly
b) use LDR to limit the highlights
prospector
08-22-2007, 04:40 PM
How did you get that internal looking gold flake???????
Bytehawk
08-22-2007, 05:31 PM
yep the pearl material rulez :)
DogBoy
08-22-2007, 05:47 PM
Prospector: I cheated :devil: there are 2 physical surfaces: the lacquer and the flecked under coat. I would have done it all in one, but I'm not that clever :thumbsdow .
Bytehawk/Matt: Yeah, I'm kinda proud of the Mother o' Pearl. I had to use IFW2 so I could displace a gradient based on incedence angle. I couldn't work out any other way (see my answer to prospector about my mental accuity).
Thanks guys for the nice words
prospector
08-22-2007, 05:52 PM
I cheated
In 3D there is no cheating.....only doing :thumbsup:
So... think ya can share settings?.....both surfaces :D
DogBoy
08-22-2007, 06:39 PM
Well, here are the objects I originally used for the pearl.
*WARNING* You need IFW2, so I've posted a screenshot as well.
As you can see it is really quite simple. I don't do complex.
I'll sort something out to show the lacquer tomorrow. I need to get to bed ;)
prospector
08-22-2007, 07:13 PM
Thanks!!! :)
GregMalick
08-22-2007, 07:32 PM
totally nice!
The light reflection seems way overblown - but I really like where you are headed with this.
tasteful tasteful tasteful :thumbsup:
warrenwc
08-22-2007, 11:41 PM
NICE!
Thanks:thumbsup:
zapper1998
08-23-2007, 02:36 AM
Oh boy...
Thank you
Awesome looking Box there..love the pearl look..
DogBoy
08-23-2007, 03:18 AM
Thanks guys. The lacquer actually needs more work.
The original piece has variable transparency on 2 levels, where mine currently only has it on 1 (and there not as it should be).
Firstly if viewed head on it was thicker towards the edges/corners so the flecking could onlt be seen in the centre of a face. That I've done.
Secondly, when viewed from obtuse angles it would too thick to be able to see the underlying surface. That I have to add. I'll just add a multiplier to the present absorption by incidence. Work of a couple of minutes, I'd guess.
I just got a bit carried away wi' the MoP.
Greg: Yeah i should dial down the saturation on the MoP somewhat, I just got carried away :jester:
colkai
08-23-2007, 03:29 AM
Well man, you know my opinion. :D
Keep it a comin' sirrah. :)
Exception
08-23-2007, 03:42 AM
As grandmaster Colkai once said in another thread that kind of slipped my mind at the moment:
"Wheee!"
That looks fantastic. Materials are beautiful but I can't understand what you've got it sitting on/floating above.
Come on man, get a proper table or floor in there!
And thanks for sharing the setup.:thumbsup:
DogBoy
08-23-2007, 04:24 AM
Iain: this was to test the materials. I have a version that is in an environment, but it takes nearly twice the time and I have to use F9s to test this as FPrime doesn't like these surfaces.
I know but it would just read better with a stool or something to ground it. Even reflect those painstakingly built materials a tiny bit.
As I said in SB1's rocket thread, just tell me to pi** off if you like :)
DogBoy
08-23-2007, 04:48 AM
As I said in SB1's rocket thread, just tell me to pi** off if you like :)
:D , nah! it's all good. I know what you mean and it was the first thing I did once I was happy wi' the work so far.
DogBoy
08-23-2007, 02:16 PM
Oops, i forgot to send the lacquer and glitter.
I'm sure that I could do this in one surface... but I didn't :D
Wopmay
08-24-2007, 02:09 AM
As you can see it is really quite simple. I don't do complex.
Gorgeous.
Simple?
R i i i i i g h t.
Somebody take pity on a poor underprivileged Waver. What does IFW2 stand for?
cagey5
08-24-2007, 02:17 AM
http://www.ifw2.co.uk/
Wopmay
08-24-2007, 02:53 AM
Thanks!
DogBoy
08-25-2007, 04:06 AM
Sorry WopMay, I should have provided a link. My bad :)
vBulletin® v3.8.2, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.