PDA

View Full Version : Intel has fallen, the G5 is king of Lightwave


Beamtracer
08-24-2003, 07:19 AM
[post deleted]

Sorry guys... false alarm. The benchmarks I'd posted from Blanos.com seem to be unreliable and for a model of machine that does not exist.

We'll have to wait 'till the real benchmarks come out... and maybe get them from a more reliable source than Blanos.

Johnny
08-24-2003, 07:52 AM
sweet!

ingo
08-24-2003, 07:59 AM
Well thats not a fair competition, since LW isn't optimized for the PowerPC G5. ;)

js33
08-24-2003, 08:04 AM
Originally posted by Ge4-ce
Well,.. I'm a misleaded myselves.. I know the guy that posted the benchmarks.. and contacted him

seems that they are fake.. He actually was trying to prove a point! These benchmarks at Blanos are just not right!! everybody can enter whatever they want! he said he just looked up the best scores and just made them a little bit better for the G5.. remember.. the G5 duals aren't shipping yet so this can't be true.. wat he just did is undermine the entire credibility of that Blanos benchmark site. You need an undependable organisation to mesure benchmarks.. So the arguments of all the pc guys based on blanos' site are just nonsense.. the guy posting these benchies proved that now!

an undependable test from newtek has to be done!

Sadly those benchmarks were faked!

But those are the kinda speeds I'm hoping to see from the dual G5. Unfortunately we will have to wait for real benchmarks.

Cheers,
JS

Beamtracer
08-24-2003, 09:12 AM
Originally posted by Ge4-ce
I know the guy that posted the benchmarks
Maybe you can let us know who he is so we can string him up by the you-know-whats! :p

Now it'll be hard to believe any benchmarks from Blanos.

Johnny
08-24-2003, 09:26 AM
Originally posted by Beamtracer
Maybe you can let us know who he is so we can string him up by the you-know-whats! :p

Certainly makes the Mac community look like desperate wankers..

But as has been pointed out, it's very simple to post anything to a benchmark site; even screen captures of render times can be faked.

Whose benchmarks ARE unimpeachably accuate and honest...free of bias..truly reflective of which box got a job done in less time?

J

DaveW
08-24-2003, 11:59 AM
Originally posted by Beamtracer


Now it'll be hard to believe any benchmarks from Blanos.

Actually this sort of thing has happened in the past, and Chris is pretty good at spotting fakes and removing them. I'm sure some fakes are easier to catch than others, but usually there are several entries for similarly configured machines so it's not difficult to spot a fake.

js33
08-24-2003, 03:36 PM
The fake G5 benchmarks have already been removed. Chris is on top of things.

Cheers,
JS

luka
08-24-2003, 08:17 PM
Yeah give Chris a break, he's done a good job. I think the benchmarks have been a good source of comparison.

Ade
08-25-2003, 01:51 AM
Originally posted by ingo
Well thats not a fair competition, since LW isn't optimized for the PowerPC G5. ;)

Since when was Lightwave optimised for any mac, nor optimsed for radeon cards?

Anyway - LONG LIVE THE G5 KING!

Darth Mole
08-25-2003, 05:02 AM
Heh heh - bit premature there, eh Beam?

Be patient - we'll have the last laugh...

Beamtracer
08-25-2003, 05:30 AM
Originally posted by Darth Mole
Heh heh - bit premature there, eh Beam? Yeah, it was. I would have felt better posting real benchmarks, whatever they were.